Surname 1Stanley Milgrams Study of ObedienceName:Course Instructor:Course title:Date:Surname 2Stanley Milgrams Study of ObedienceFirst AuthorYes, it is true to note that Milgrams study of obedience to the authority was unethical.One of the primary issues which demerit the experiment is the fact that he used gross deceptionto collect information that could adequately provide answers to his hypothesis. Kemmelmeieraffirms that Proper research ethics require that a researcher notifies the participants of the realpurpose of the study, and thus highlight the specific elements which are necessary from therespondents (Kemmelmeier 104). In this case, Milgram lied to his respondents that he wasexperimenting to ascertain the effects of punishment on learning. To make matters worse, thescientist lured individuals to participate by providing them with some amount of cash just forshowing up for the experiment. On the other hand, the consent for the study was not an informedone as the participants were unaware of the full details of the operation. Additionally, therespondents were unaware of their freedom to withdraw because any time they raised a concernthey were informed that they must continue (Milgram 103). The statement shows that theexperiment was being performed under dictatorial terms, and thus the information from therespondent cannot be certified as been the free will of the individual. Moreover, some of theparticipants in the experiment aired th ...
To Order an Original Plagiarism Free Paper on the Same Topic Click Here
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
