FIND A SOLUTIONAT All A+ Essays

1SLE763 Research Frontiers Project, Trimester Two, 2020SLE763 Assessment Task OneLiterature Review – Document GuidelinesBackgroundA thorough literature review is conducted as part of the assessment in the unit Research FrontiersProject – SLE763. At the start of trimester students need to find a suitable research topic. Studentsare required to complete a literature review on this topic and are recommended to seek regulardiscussion and feedback from an academic project supervisor.There is no strict word count but a suitably detailed literature review will usually require over2000 words of text. This assessment task contributes 40% of the overall unit mark.What is a literature review?A literature review is a classification and evaluation of what other researchers have written on atopic, organized according to a guiding concept, such as your research question, aims andhypotheses.• Your objective is not to rack up points by listing as many articles as possible, although yoursearch for pertinent information should be thorough, and your reading both wide and deep.• You want to demonstrate your intellectual ability to recognize relevant information, and tosynthesise and evaluate it according to the guiding concept you have determined for yourself.• Your reader not only wants to know what literature exists, but also your informedevaluation of the literature.To meet the needs described above, you must employ two sets of skills, information seeking andcritical appraisal.• Information seeking: something most students are very familiar with (if not necessarily good at)after writing essays in their previous studies. At heart, this is the ability to scan the literatureefficiently using manual or computerised methods to identify a set of potentially useful journalarticles and books.• Critical appraisal: something most novice researchers misunderstand. Critical appraisal is notabout finding fault or “bagging” other research(ers), but rather the ability to apply principles ofanalysis to identify those studies which are unbiased and valid.A literature review is NOT just a summary, but a conceptually organized synthesis of the resultsof your search for information relating to your chosen research topic. It must• Organize information and relate it to the research question you aredeveloping.• Synthesise information into a summary of what is and isn’t known.• Identify controversy when it appears in the literature.• Develop questions for further research.• Link the reviewed literature to your proposed research project.A literature review is:• NOT a simple list of summaries of “who did what, where and when” on your topic (recently) inyour field. Your readers want more just than a descriptive list of articles and books. It’s usually abad sign when every paragraph of your review begins with the names of researchers et al.• NOT just a series of abstracts culled from your (electronic) literature.• NOT a description of what you did to find your source material.2SLE763 Research Frontiers Project, Trimester Two, 2020• NOT a critique of how trustworthy you believe the information to be (although that may be apart of some discussions within the review).Some questions to ask yourself when you undertake your review:• Do I have a specific problem, or research question, which (aspects of) my literaturereview helps to define?• What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?methodology? policy? quantitative research or qualitative research?• What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (eg.,journals, books, government documents, popular media?)• What discipline am I working in (eg., freshwater ecology, forensicscience)?• How good are my information seeking skills? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I havefound all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material?• What if there is little or no published information on my methods, organisms, locations? Have Iwidened the search to cover more generic material (eg stepped back from species to family orgenus level, or to similar locations elsewhere in the world, to gain more insight?)• Is there a specific relationship between the literature I have chosen to review and the problem Ihave formulated? Or am I still using the review to help formulate the problem?• Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I just list and summarise authors and articles,or do I provide sufficient detail extracted from the articles to illuminate the assertions beingmade? Do I assess them? Do I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the cited material?• Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?• Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?Questions to Ask Yourself as you review the books and articles you call “your literature”:• Has the author formulated a problem/issue?• Is the problem/issue ambiguous or clearly articulated? Is its significance (scope, severity,relevance) discussed?• What are the strengths and limitations of the way the author has formulated the problem orissue?• Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?• What is the relationship between the theoretical and researchperspectives?• Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the authorinclude literature taking positions s/he does not agree with?• In a research study, how good are the basic components of the study design? How accurate andvalid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the researchquestion? Are the conclusions validly based upon the data andanalysis?• In popular literature, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples, rhetoricallycharged language and tone? Is the author objective, or is s/he merely ‘proving’ what s/healready believes?• How does the author structure his or her argument? Can you ‘deconstruct’ the flow of theargument to analyse if/where it breaks down?• Is this a book or article that contributes to our understanding of the problem under study, andin what ways is it useful for practice? What are the strengths and limitations?• How does this book or article fit into the thesis or question I am developing?(Adapted from: Dr. D. Taylor. Writing a Literature Review In the Health Sciences and Social Work,University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre)3SLE763 Research Frontiers Project, Trimester Two, 2020Literature Review FormatThere is no set format for the written document. The best advice is to seek out and follow the styleof a high quality review journal, or top ranked journals that publish reviews, in your field. Inpreparation for completing the assignment, you are required to familiarise yourself with allavailable literature on key aspects of your topic. This will require extensive searching of DeakinUniversity’s library and electronic searching of journal databases.• In some cases, information will be found in books, but not usually. You are expected to accessthe primary literature, i.e. papers published in research journals or collected volumes.• In some cases, it is acceptable to access and quote from internet pages, but if you do so, beprepared to critically evaluate the information presented by the web page authors. Be preparedto back up assertions made on the basis of information extracted from such pages by crossreferencing to more authoritative literature (journals and books have generally been peerreviewed, web pages have not. There is no quality control on most web pages and theirinformation is viewed as being less scientifically trustworthy as a result).• You are expected to obtain a copy and read in its entirety any document you cite in your writtenpaper – simply collecting, reading and summarising (electronic) abstracts has been described asacademic fraud. Do not do it!• Inter-library loans are available for Postgraduate students. In addition, some supervisors willsubmit requests for their students – particularly if an article interests the supervisor too!Accessing journal articles by inter library loan takes time. Time is precious, so don’t wait untilnear the submission dates before you start collecting information. You won’t have time, and itwill show in your written document.Important: For the purposes of this assessment task, it is very important that you link the reviewedliterature to your proposed research project as part of your review. This can be done during thereview or in a separate section at the end of your review.You will present your Literature Review by submitting a detailed, written report for assessment. Somethings you might want to consider when preparing your Literature Review are:• Have you clearly defined the specific research problem / question at the heart of your researchproject, and discussed the significance of the research question / problem? Have youstructured the narrative of your review in the context of your researchfield?• Have you located most of the suitable papers, especially the key papers, relevant to your topic?Have you described their content, and extracted sufficient detail from the papers (data) toilluminate the conclusions made by their authors and your own assertions based on yourunderstanding (comprehension) of the material?• Have you synthesised what is and isn’t known in the specific research field? Is your reviewa thorough introduction to the topic for the new researcher in the field, and a thoroughready-reference for the expert in the field?• Is the review coherent? Does the narrative structure hold together and flow from one point tothe next using cohesive links? Is your citing of published works consistent, accurate andcomprehensive, i.e. are all your citations made in the same style? Have you eliminated allgrammar, spelling and punctuation errors?4SLE763 Research Frontiers Project, Trimester Two, 2020Literature Review SubmissionSubmit your Literature Review to the relevant dropbox on the SLE763 CloudDeakin site.• It is highly recommended that throughout the drafting process you regularly submit your workthrough the practice Turn-It-In Assignment Dropbox on CloudDeakin. This will allow you to identifyany issues related to plagiarism or referencing and attend to them prior to submission of the finalversion.Due dates• Check unit site for the relevant due datePENALTIES: If you do not meet the deadline and you do not have an approved extension, you will bepenalised. Late submissions will be subject to a mark penalty equal to 5% of the marks per day, up toand including five days after the published due date. Assignments submitted more than five days postthe published submission date will not be marked.Literature Review AssessmentYour review will be assessed according to the criteria on the following page. You will also receivegeneral comments on your document to help you refine future versions of the review.5SLE763 Research Frontiers Project, Trimester Two, 2020SLE763 Literature Review Marking Criteria
Grading Criteriai.e. how well did the candidate:
Mark
Review the literature, including range and relevance of the literature?• Has candidate located suitable articles from the primary literature (original journalarticles, books etc), secondary literature and personalexperience?• Where electronic sources are quoted, has the candidate, where appropriate andpossible to do so, cross-referenced material to the primaryliterature?• Did the candidate identify and emphasise the importantfindings/data?• Was the review organised according to guiding concepts, i.e by researchquestions/research fields etc given the information accessed?• Do the details of the published information educate and illuminate, i.e. has sufficient detailbeenextracted from the literature and provided to back-up the summaries, generalisationsand assertions being made in the review?
/20
Interpretation and discussion• Have the key papers been identified?• Key points of papers drawn out and discussed in relation to other, relevantstudies?• Limitations to published methodologies/results identified anddiscussed?• Speculation and generalisations appropriate to the information collected by thecandidate?• Directions for future research identified?
/20
Review Coherence• Is the review a synthesis of what is and isn’t known about the researchfield?• Is the review a thorough introduction for the new researcher in this field?• Is the review a thorough ready-reference for the expert in the field?• Is the narrative structured in the context of the researchfield?• Does the review educate and illuminate?
/20
Define the specific research problem?• Identification of the problem or research question to be addressed by candidate’sproject?• Aims and objectives of project clearly defined and linked to materialreviewed?
/15
Define the significance of the research problem/question?• Sufficient detail provided for the significance of the proposed study to beunderstood?• Has the characteristics of the issue/phenomenon/organisms been described?
/15
References (Bibliography)• Was the literature cited consistently within the body of the review, i.e. a single, referencingstyle?• Did the references section contain all cited material, and conform to a single bibliographicstyle?
/10
TOTAL
/100

• Assignment status:Already Solved By Our Experts
• (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER– NO PLAGIARISM– CUSTOM PAPER